27 July 2026

What moved today

Nothing was filed in the last twenty four hours, which is what a weekend looks like on EDGAR. Across the past seven days, 553 disclosures against 13 tracked phrases, 7 of them moving sharply. Every row below opens the companies that filed it and the controls it obligates.

Updated

+129%Artificial Intelligence91 to 208 companies this weekSee who filed it and what it obligates →+88%Operational Resilience59 to 111 companies, year on yearSee who filed it and what it obligates →+341%AI Governance17 to 75 companies, year on yearSee who filed it and what it obligates →+231%Ransomware13 to 43 companies this weekSee who filed it and what it obligates →+533%Cybersecurity Incident3 to 19 companies this weekSee who filed it and what it obligates →+100%Data Breach8 to 16 companies this weekSee who filed it and what it obligates →

What public companies wrote into filings with the SEC, counted against the period before. Every one opens the companies that filed it and what it obligates. See the full tables.

553disclosures, past 7 days
0since yesterday, markets closed
7phrases moved sharply
1event naming an obligation
20,473controls they land on
now

Drag to see which disclosures were rising in any year since the archive begins. The tables below recompute against the year before.

What companies disclosed this week

Public companies writing each phrase into an 8-K in the last seven days, against the seven days before, and how many of those arrived since yesterday. An 8-K must be filed within four business days of the event, so this is the fastest signal in the set. Ordered by how surprising each change is at the size it happened, so a swing of sixty-nine companies out of five hundred outranks seven out of three. Every row opens the filers and what it obligates.

DisclosureSince yesterdayPast 7 daysChangeNamed
Artificial Intelligence0208+117 filers, +129%12 named
Ransomware043+30 filers, +231%12 named
Cybersecurity Incident019+16 filers, +533%12 named
Restatement083+26 filers, +46%12 named
Internal Control088+25 filers, +40%12 named
Enforcement Action035+14 filers, +67%12 named
Data Breach016+8 filers, +100%12 named
Regulatory Investigation05small numbers either way6 named
AI Governance03small numbers either way3 named
Third Party Risk03small numbers either way3 named
Model Risk01first appearance1 named
Consent Order035+5 filers, +17%12 named
Material Weakness014+1 filers, +8%12 named

And in annual and quarterly filings, year on year

The same phrases in 10-K and 10-Q filings, this quarter against the same quarter last year, most surprising change first. Slower and less noisy than the 8-K table: a company changing what it writes in a 10-K has changed its mind about what is material.

DisclosureThis quarterChangeNamed
AI Governance75+58 filers, +341%16 named
Operational Resilience111+52 filers, +88%16 named
Data Governance101+43 filers, +74%16 named
Privacy Compliance115+36 filers, +46%12 named
Business Continuity642+69 filers, +12%16 named
Algorithmic Bias10+7 filers, +233%10 named
Whistleblower Program40+13 filers, +48%16 named
ESG Reporting19-11 filers, -37%16 named
Third Party Risk Management83+16 filers, +24%16 named
Ransomware879+53 filers, +6%13 named
Data Residency44+11 filers, +33%16 named
SOC 276+12 filers, +19%6 named
Regulatory Reporting204+19 filers, +10%16 named
Identity And Access Management32+7 filers, +28%13 named
Climate Related Disclosure29-7 filers, -19%16 named
Model Validation23+5 filers, +28%16 named
Artificial Intelligence Risk5small numbers either way4 named
Records Retention20-4 filers, -17%16 named
Supply Chain Due Diligence7small numbers either way7 named
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Material Weakness9small numbers either way9 named
Audit Committee Oversight36+3 filers, +9%16 named
Cross Border Data Transfer133-1 filers, -1%16 named
Vendor Risk Management19unchanged at 1916 named
Cybersecurity Incident Disclosure2small numbers either way2 named

What else moved

Regulator notices, incidents, research and industry news from the last 30 hours that name an obligation in the corpus. Ordered by whether the item is an event or a comment on one. Not a score: a sort.

Nothing outside the filings named an obligation today.

Who is hiring for it

Job postings naming a specific obligation. An employer paying a salary against a framework is the least ambiguous demand signal there is.

How this page is made

The disclosure counts come from SEC full-text search over 8-K filings, counted across the last seven days against the seven before, with the filers named. The window slides a day every morning, so today's number is not yesterday's. Public record, and every number is one click from the filing.

The tables are ordered by how far apart the two counts are relative to the variation you would expect at that scale, which is the standard comparison for count data. Percentage alone would put a three-to-ten move above a five-hundred-and-seventy- three-to-six-hundred-and-forty-two move; volume alone would show the same large topics every day and never show anything moving. Both numbers that drive the ordering are printed on every row so it can be checked by eye.

What each disclosure obligates comes from our corpus: 723 frameworks and 20,473 controls, 531 frameworks verified against their source documents. A control appears against a theme because its own text names it, so "why is that on the list" always has a checkable answer.

61 further items were read today. Those naming no obligation are counted rather than hidden, because a page that only ever shows hits is not measuring anything. Nothing here is generated, predicted or scored.

Today's edition, permanently · First detected · How much of that do you already have? · How compliance programmes fail · The obligation index · Unmet demand · What we killed