19filers, current period
30the period before
6controls it touches
6frameworks
The long view
Filings containing this phrase, every month since 2008. The last
point is the current month and is still filling, so it always looks lower than it will be.
2008
peak 81 in February 2024
2026
Who disclosed it
From SEC full-text search over 8-K filings. Every row links to the filing itself.
| Company | Form | Filed | |
|---|
| CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC CSGS | 8-K | 2026-05-06 | filing |
| MPLX LP | 8-K | 2026-05-05 | filing |
| Marathon Petroleum Corp MPC | 8-K | 2026-05-05 | filing |
| SCHOLASTIC CORP SCHL | 10-K | 2026-07-24 | filing |
| TMC the metals Co Inc. | 10-Q | 2026-05-14 | filing |
| ASIAFIN HOLDINGS CORP. ASFH | 10-Q | 2026-05-13 | filing |
| EXPRO GROUP HOLDINGS N.V. XPRO | 10-Q | 2026-05-05 | filing |
| Ultragenyx Pharmaceutical Inc. RARE | 10-Q | 2026-05-06 | filing |
| QUINSTREET, INC QNST | 10-Q | 2026-05-08 | filing |
| Nautilus Biotechnology, Inc. NAUT | 10-Q | 2026-04-28 | filing |
| CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. CRUS | 10-K | 2026-05-21 | filing |
| Salesforce, Inc. CRM | 10-Q | 2026-05-28 | filing |
| PACIFIC BIOSCIENCES OF CALIFORNIA, INC. PACB | 10-Q | 2026-05-08 | filing |
| LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A. LOGI | 10-K | 2026-05-21 | filing |
| CRESCENT BIOPHARMA, INC. CBIO | 10-Q | 2026-04-29 | filing |
| QXO, Inc. | 8-K | 2026-06-17 | filing |
The full search on EDGAR
Which industries file it
Companies grouped by the industry classification on their own filing. A count, not a
survey.
| Industry | | Companies |
|---|
| Chemicals and pharmaceuticals | | 31 |
| Software and IT services | | 29 |
| Holding and investment offices | | 23 |
| Industrial machinery | | 18 |
| Electronics and electrical equipment | | 13 |
| Instruments and medical devices | | 13 |
| Retail | | 11 |
| Securities and investment | | 11 |
| Mining and extraction | | 11 |
| Services and entertainment | | 11 |
What it obligates
Our corpus holds 6 controls across
6 frameworks whose text speaks to this. Not a judgement:
these controls say so, and each is one lookup from its source document. Ordered by how much each
framework has to say about it, so the one that will cost you the most work is first. Every name
opens that framework in the corpus.
What an auditor will ask you to produce
The artefacts named on those controls, most frequently cited first.
- Reasonable care defence + records + per control + audit trail + training records
- AI Strategy + Board approved + records + per quarter + Tone at Top
- AI inventory + comprehensive + records + per system + quarterly review + sign-off
- AI Ethics Committee + diverse membership + records + per meeting + escalation log
- Multi-regulator + APPI/FSA/PMDA/sector + records + per obligation + compliance calendar
- Criterion 6 consultation evidence (workshops + interviews + surveys + Board-to-Board)
- Joint statement coordination evidence (parent + subsidiary acknowledgement)
- Criterion 7 SDG 8.7 + 5.2 + 16.2 alignment + UNGC + GRI 408/409/414 + SASB + ISSB + ASRS reporting integration
How it usually fails
Recorded when each control was verified against its source. This is where programmes
that think they are covered turn out not to be.
- Reasonable care defence undocumented
- D and O insurance excludes privacy claims
- AI Strategy theoretical (no Board engagement)
- AI inventory incomplete (shadow AI)
- AI Ethics Committee homogeneous (groupthink)
- Multi-regulator compliance siloed
Where this comes from
The left half is public record: SEC full-text search over 8-K filings, counted across a
14 day window against the equivalent window before it. You can check
every row.
The right half is ours: 723 frameworks and
20,473 controls, 531 of those frameworks verified against
their source documents, with the auditor evidence and common failure modes recorded control by
control. Controls appear here because their own text names this term.
Today's edition ·
How programmes fail ·
The obligation index