WILLIS TOWERS WATSON PLC vs MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC., risk disclosures compared

6topics both disclose

6only WILLIS TOWERS WATSON PLC

5only MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.

What both disclose

Topics appearing in filings from both companies, and how many filings each.

Topic	WILLIS TOWERS WATSON PLC	MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.
Ransomware	7	48
Business Continuity	30	14
Artificial Intelligence	12	12
Regulatory Reporting	11	2
Internal Control	8	2
Restatement	7	3

Only WILLIS TOWERS WATSON PLC

Topic	Filings
SOC 2	3
Artificial Intelligence Risk	2
Operational Resilience	2
Privacy Compliance	2
Third Party Risk Management	2
Model Risk	1

Only MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC.

Topic	Filings
Data Governance	3
ESG Reporting	2
Consent Order	1
Data Breach	1
Material Weakness	1

What this compares

Which of the topics we track appear in each company's SEC filings, and how often. A topic appearing for one company and not the other means one wrote the phrase down and the other did not, in the filings we hold. It does not mean one faces a risk the other does not, and it is not a comparison of how well either manages anything.

Counts reflect the filings we have collected, which is a growing subset rather than a company's complete history.

WILLIS TOWERS WATSON PLC · MARSH & MCLENNAN COMPANIES, INC. · All companies