Framework overlap

Does Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) cover AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF)?

You hold Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and have been told to do AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF). Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

54% of AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF) you already have

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) already covers about 54% of AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF), leaving 12 of 26 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 5 Likely covered 9 New work 12

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) reaches these. This is the list to scope.

PMF-A.2
Access Request Process
PMF-AN.1
Privacy Notice
PMF-AN.2
Purpose Specification
PMF-AN.3
Privacy Agreements
PMF-CC.1
Lawful and Fair Collection
PMF-D.1
Third-Party Disclosure Controls
PMF-D.2
Third-Party Agreements
PMF-D.3
Onward Transfer Accountability
PMF-M.2
Privacy Policies and Procedures
PMF-ME.1
Privacy Program Monitoring
PMF-URD.1
Use Limitation
PMF-URD.2
Retention Periods
Show the 14 you already have
PMF-DI.1
Data Accuracy
PMF-DI.2
Data Quality Processes
PMF-M.1
Privacy Program Governance
PMF-ME.2
Complaint Handling
PMF-ME.3
Enforcement and Remediation
PMF-A.1
Individual Access Rights
PMF-CC.2
Collection Limitation
PMF-CC.3
Consent Mechanisms
PMF-M.3
Privacy Risk Assessment
PMF-M.4
Privacy Incident Management
PMF-SP.1
Information Security Program
PMF-SP.2
Security Safeguards
PMF-SP.3
Security Testing and Monitoring
PMF-URD.3
Secure Disposal

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition