Framework overlap

Does AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF) cover Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

You hold AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF) and have been told to do Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018). Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

71% of Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) you already have

AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF) already covers about 71% of Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018), leaving 4 of 14 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 5 Likely covered 5 New work 4

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF) reaches these. This is the list to scope.

AT-DSG-1
Section 1 - Fundamental right to data protection
AT-DSG-3
Section 4(4) - Age of consent for children
AT-DSG-5
Section 9 - Media and journalistic exemption
AT-DSG-9
Section 24 - Complaint procedures
Show the 10 you already have
AT-DSG-11
Sections 42-45 - Data subject rights (law enforcement)
AT-DSG-13
Section 36 - Scope of law enforcement processing
AT-DSG-14
Section 38 - Lawfulness of law enforcement processing
AT-DSG-2
Section 2 - Scope and application
AT-DSG-8
Section 22 - Functions and powers of the DPA
AT-DSG-10
Section 29 - Liability and right to compensation / civil jurisdiction
AT-DSG-12
Section 62 - Administrative penalties
AT-DSG-4
Section 6 - Data secrecy (Datengeheimnis)
AT-DSG-6
Sections 12-13 - Image processing (video surveillance/CCTV)
AT-DSG-7
Section 18 - Establishment of the Data Protection Authority

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF) to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition