60% of OWASP Top 10:2025 you already have
SOC 2 already covers about 60% of OWASP Top 10:2025, leaving
4 of 10 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 6
New work 4
No control in SOC 2
maps directly to one in OWASP Top 10:2025. Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in SOC 2 reaches these. This is the list to scope.
OWASPTOP10-10A10:2025 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
OWASPTOP10-3A03:2025 Injection Including Cross-Site Scripting
OWASPTOP10-5A05:2025 Security Misconfiguration
OWASPTOP10-8A08:2025 Software and Data Integrity Failures
Show the 6 you already have
OWASPTOP10-1A01:2025 Broken Access Control
OWASPTOP10-2A02:2025 Cryptographic Failures and Secret Management
OWASPTOP10-4A04:2025 Insecure Design and Business Logic (incl. A11 API Abuse)
OWASPTOP10-6A06:2025 Vulnerable and Outdated Components
OWASPTOP10-7A07:2025 Identification and Authentication Failures
OWASPTOP10-9A09:2025 Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in SOC 2 to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition