Framework overlap

Does SOC 2 cover Nebraska Data Privacy Act?

You hold SOC 2 and have been told to do Nebraska Data Privacy Act. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

88% of Nebraska Data Privacy Act you already have

SOC 2 already covers about 88% of Nebraska Data Privacy Act, leaving 1 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 2 Likely covered 5 New work 1

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in SOC 2 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

NDPA-3
Opt-Out Rights for Targeted Advertising, Sale, and Profiling
Show the 7 you already have
NDPA-2
Consumer Rights - Access, Correct, Delete, Portability, Appeal
NDPA-5
Privacy Notice, Data Minimisation, and Purpose Limitation
NDPA-1
Applicability, Scope, and Carve-Outs
NDPA-4
Sensitive Data Processing Consent and Childrens Protections
NDPA-6
Reasonable Security Practices and Incident Response
NDPA-7
Data Protection Assessments and Processor Contracts
NDPA-8
Nebraska Attorney General Enforcement, Permanent 30-Day Cure, and Penalties

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in SOC 2 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition