75% of Oman National Cybersecurity Framework you already have
PCI PIN Security already covers about 75% of Oman National Cybersecurity Framework, leaving
2 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 6
New work 2
No control in PCI PIN Security
maps directly to one in Oman National Cybersecurity Framework. Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in PCI PIN Security reaches these. This is the list to scope.
OMANCS-1Cybersecurity Governance, Policy, and Risk Management
OMANCS-2Asset Management and Information Classification
Show the 6 you already have
OMANCS-3Identity and Access Management, Authentication, Privileged Access
OMANCS-4Data Protection, Cryptography, and Privacy Alignment
OMANCS-5Network, Endpoint, System Development, and Configuration Security
OMANCS-6Security Monitoring, Detection, Incident Response, and OmanCERT Notification
OMANCS-7Business Continuity, Disaster Recovery, and Resilience
OMANCS-8Third-Party + Supply Chain Risk, Awareness Training, Physical Security, Compliance Audit
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in PCI PIN Security to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition