Framework overlap

Does PCI PIN Security cover NFPA 1600?

You hold PCI PIN Security and have been told to do NFPA 1600. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

23% of NFPA 1600 you already have

PCI PIN Security already covers about 23% of NFPA 1600, leaving 27 of 35 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 5 Likely covered 3 New work 27

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in PCI PIN Security reaches these. This is the list to scope.

NFPA1600-01
Program Scope and Objectives
NFPA1600-02
Program Coordinator and Committee
NFPA1600-03
Laws and Authorities Identification
NFPA1600-04
Risk Assessment
NFPA1600-05
Business Impact Analysis
NFPA1600-06
Resource Needs Assessment
NFPA1600-07
Prevention and Mitigation Strategy
NFPA1600-08
Emergency Operations and Response Plan
NFPA1600-09
Crisis Communications
NFPA1600-10
Continuity of Operations Plan
NFPA1600-11
Recovery Plan
NFPA1600-12
Employee Assistance and Support
NFPA1600-13
Training
NFPA1600-14
Exercises
NFPA1600-15
Program Evaluation and Maintenance
NFPA1600-16
Records Management
NFPA1600-17
Finance and Administration
NFPA1600-18
Mutual Aid and Assistance
NFPA1600-4.2
Program Coordinator
NFPA1600-4.3
Program Committee
NFPA1600-4.4
Laws, Authorities and Financing
NFPA1600-4.5
Records Management
NFPA1600-5.2
Business Impact Analysis
NFPA1600-6.1
Prevention and Mitigation
NFPA1600-6.5
Employee Assistance and Support
NFPA1600-7.1
Exercise Program
NFPA1600-8.1
Program Review and Evaluation
Show the 8 you already have
NFPA1600-4.1
Leadership and Commitment
NFPA1600-5.3
Resource Needs Assessment
NFPA1600-6.2
Crisis Management and Communications
NFPA1600-6.3
Emergency Response Operations
NFPA1600-6.4
Continuity and Recovery
NFPA1600-5.1
Risk Assessment
NFPA1600-7.2
After-Action Reporting
NFPA1600-8.2
Corrective Action

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in PCI PIN Security to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition