Framework overlap

Does PCI PIN Security cover Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)?

You hold PCI PIN Security and have been told to do Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018). Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

50% of Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018) you already have

PCI PIN Security already covers about 50% of Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018), leaving 4 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 4 New work 4

No control in PCI PIN Security maps directly to one in Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018). Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in PCI PIN Security reaches these. This is the list to scope.

ItalyCodice-CrossBorder-Transfer-Adequacy-SCCs-BCRs-Retention-ItalianSectorRules-EUDataAct
Italy Codice Cross-Border Transfer + EU Adequacy + Standard Contractual Clauses + Binding Corporate Rules + EU Data Act + Italian Sector Retention Rules + Schrems II + Transfer Imp
ItalyCodice-LawfulBasis-Notice-Italian-Language-Public-Bodies-Consent-2bis-2ter-Article6-GDPR
Italy Codice Lawful Basis + GDPR Article 6 + Italian-Specific 2-bis Legal Basis + 2-ter Public Bodies + Notice in Italian Language + Consent + Italian-Specific Derogations + Data S
ItalyCodice-Scope-LegDec196-2003-Amendment101-2018-GDPR-Implementation-Garante-Constitution-Art21
Italy Codice Privacy Scope - Legislative Decree No. 196 of 30 June 2003 (Codice in materia di protezione dei dati personali) + Amendment by Legislative Decree No. 101 of 10 August
ItalyCodice-Security-CPO-DPO-PublicBodies-BreachNotification-Art31-34-DPIA-ROPA-JointControllers-Processors
Italy Codice Security - Article 31 Designation of CPO + Italian DPO Requirements + DPO Mandatory for Public Bodies + Article 34 Breach Notification + DPIA + ROPA + Joint Controller
Show the 4 you already have
ItalyCodice-DataSubjectRights-Limitations-Deceased-Minors-14-Years-Italian-2undecies-2duodecies-2terdecies
Italy Codice Data Subject Rights + Article 2-undecies Limitations + Article 2-duodecies Deceased Persons Rights + Article 2-terdecies Minors Rights (14 Years Consent Age) + GDPR Ar
ItalyCodice-Garante-Enforcement-AdministrativeSanctions-Criminal-Art166-167-170-20MEUR-Coord-EDPB
Italy Codice Garante Authority + Article 140-bis + Article 144 Complaints + Article 166 Administrative Sanctions up to EUR 20M/4% + Article 167 Criminal Offences + Article 170 Fail
ItalyCodice-SpecialCategories-Health-Workplace-Education-ScientificResearch-HistoricalResearch-Art75-92-96-99-101
Italy Codice Special Categories + Article 75 Administrative Fines + Article 92 Medical Records + Article 96 Education + Article 99 Scientific Research + Article 101 Historical Rese
ItalyCodice-ePrivacy-Cookies-ElectronicCommunications-Telemarketing-PublicOpposition-TrafficDataRetention-Art121-122-130-132
Italy Codice ePrivacy - Article 121 Electronic Communications + Article 122 Cookies and Tracking + Article 130 Unsolicited Direct Marketing + Article 132 Traffic Data Retention + I

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in PCI PIN Security to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition