5% of ISO/IEC 29134:2023 you already have
PCI PIN Security already covers about 5% of ISO/IEC 29134:2023, leaving
37 of 39 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 2
New work 37
No control in PCI PIN Security
maps directly to one in ISO/IEC 29134:2023. Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in PCI PIN Security reaches these. This is the list to scope.
29134-5.1Determining PIA necessity
29134-5.2Defining PIA scope
29134-5.3Stakeholder identification
29134-6.1Information flow identification
29134-6.2PII processing description
29134-6.3Legal basis analysis
29134-7.1Risk identification
29134-7.2Impact assessment
29134-7.3Likelihood assessment
29134-8.1Treatment options
29134-8.2Control selection
29134-8.3Residual risk assessment
29134-9.3PIA review and update
29134-9.4Publication and communication
ISO29134-10.1PIA Implementation Tracking
ISO29134-10.2PIA Review and Update
ISO29134-10.3Prior Consultation with Supervisory Authority
ISO29134-11.1PIA Programme Maturity
ISO29134-5.1PIA Trigger Identification
ISO29134-5.2PIA Scope Definition
ISO29134-5.3PIA Team Composition
ISO29134-6.1Processing Description
ISO29134-6.2Necessity and Proportionality Assessment
ISO29134-6.3Stakeholder Consultation
ISO29134-7.1Privacy Risk Identification
ISO29134-7.2Likelihood Assessment
ISO29134-7.3Severity Assessment
ISO29134-7.4Risk Evaluation Against Criteria
ISO29134-8.1Risk Treatment Measures
ISO29134-8.2Residual Risk Documentation
ISO29134-9.1PIA Report Documentation
ISO29134-9.2PIA Approval and Sign Off
ISO29134-9.3PIA Publication and Sharing
Show the 2 you already have
29134-9.1PIA report structure
29134-9.2Report findings and recommendations
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in PCI PIN Security to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition