Framework overlap

Does PCI P2PE cover Uruguay DPL?

You hold PCI P2PE and have been told to do Uruguay DPL. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

83% of Uruguay DPL you already have

PCI P2PE already covers about 83% of Uruguay DPL, leaving 1 of 6 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 2 Likely covered 3 New work 1

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in PCI P2PE reaches these. This is the list to scope.

URUGUAY-6
DPO, Governance, Breach
Show the 5 you already have
URUGUAY-3
Sensitive Data, Health Data, Children
URUGUAY-4
Security and Cross-Border
URUGUAY-1
Scope, Lawful Basis, Consent
URUGUAY-2
Data Subject Rights (ARCO + Habeas Data)
URUGUAY-5
Database Registration with AGESIC URCDP

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in PCI P2PE to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition