Framework overlap

Does PCI P2PE cover Mexico LFPDPPP?

You hold PCI P2PE and have been told to do Mexico LFPDPPP. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

75% of Mexico LFPDPPP you already have

PCI P2PE already covers about 75% of Mexico LFPDPPP, leaving 2 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 6 New work 2

No control in PCI P2PE maps directly to one in Mexico LFPDPPP. Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in PCI P2PE reaches these. This is the list to scope.

MX-LFPDPPP-Eight-Principles-Article-6-Licitud-Consentimiento-Informacion-Calidad-Finalidad-Lealtad-Proporcionalidad-Responsabilidad
Mexico LFPDPPP Eight Principles + Article 6 + Licitud + Consentimiento + Informacion + Calidad + Finalidad + Lealtad + Proporcionalidad + Responsabilidad
MX-LFPDPPP-Scope-Article-3-DOF-5-July-2010-Effective-6-July-2010-INAI-Reglamento-2011-Constitution-Articles-6-16
Mexico LFPDPPP Scope + Article 3 + DOF 5 July 2010 + INAI + Reglamento 2011 + Constitution Articles 6 and 16
Show the 6 you already have
MX-LFPDPPP-ARCO-Rights-Articles-22-25-Acceso-Rectificacion-Cancelacion-Oposicion-Reglamento-89-103
Mexico LFPDPPP ARCO Rights + Articles 22-25 + Acceso + Rectificacion + Cancelacion + Oposicion + Reglamento 89-103
MX-LFPDPPP-Cross-Border-Transfer-Articles-36-37-Reglamento-66-68-Domestic-International-APEC-CBPR-USMCA
Mexico LFPDPPP Cross-Border + Articles 36-37 + Reglamento 66 + 68 + Domestic + International + APEC CBPR + USMCA
MX-LFPDPPP-Enforcement-INAI-Articles-63-64-67-320K-Days-Minimum-Wage-3-Year-Prison-TFJA-Recurso-Revision-SCJN
Mexico LFPDPPP Enforcement + INAI + Articles 63-64-67 + 320K Days Minimum Wage + 3 Year Prison + TFJA + Recurso de Revision + SCJN
MX-LFPDPPP-Governance-Officer-Reglamento-47-50-Security-Manual-57-Risk-Assessment-61-Self-Regulation-Parameters-2014
Mexico LFPDPPP Governance + Officer + Reglamento 47 + Security Manual 50 + Risk Assessment 57 + Self-Regulation Parameters 2014
MX-LFPDPPP-Security-Breach-Notification-Reglamento-63-No-Time-Limit-INAI-Recommendations-CERT-MX
Mexico LFPDPPP Security + Breach Notification + Reglamento 63 + No Specified Time + INAI Recommendations + CERT-MX
MX-LFPDPPP-Sensitive-Article-3-VI-Genetic-Health-Sexual-Religious-Article-9-Minors-18-Parental-Consent
Mexico LFPDPPP Sensitive Data + Article 3 Section VI + Genetic + Health + Sexual + Religious + Article 9 Minors + Parental Consent

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in PCI P2PE to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition