Framework overlap

Does PCI P2PE cover ISO 19011?

You hold PCI P2PE and have been told to do ISO 19011. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

24% of ISO 19011 you already have

PCI P2PE already covers about 24% of ISO 19011, leaving 26 of 34 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 3 Likely covered 5 New work 26

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in PCI P2PE reaches these. This is the list to scope.

4.a
Integrity Principle
4.b
Fair Presentation
4.c
Due Professional Care
4.e
Independence
4.f
Evidence-Based Approach
5.4
Establishing Audit Programme
5.5
Implementing Audit Programme
5.6
Monitoring Audit Programme
5.7
Threat intelligence
7.5
Threat assessment
ISO19011-01
Quality policy and objectives
ISO19011-02
Leadership commitment to quality
ISO19011-03
Risk-based thinking and planning
ISO19011-04
Resource management for quality
ISO19011-05
Organizational roles and responsibilities
ISO19011-06
Operational planning and control
ISO19011-07
Requirements for products and services
ISO19011-08
Design and development controls
ISO19011-09
Control of externally provided processes
ISO19011-10
Production and service provision controls
ISO19011-11
Monitoring, measurement, and analysis
ISO19011-12
Internal audit program
ISO19011-13
Management review process
ISO19011-14
Customer satisfaction measurement
ISO19011-16
Continual improvement methodology
ISO19011-17
Corrective and preventive actions
Show the 8 you already have
6.5
Preparing and Distributing Audit Report
6.6
Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
6.7
Conducting Audit Follow-up
4.d
Confidentiality
4.g
Risk-Based Approach
6.4
Logging and Monitoring
ISO19011-15
Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO19011-18
Innovation and change management

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in PCI P2PE to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition