52% of GDPR you already have
OpenSSF Scorecard already covers about 52% of GDPR, leaving
13 of 27 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 14
New work 13
No control in OpenSSF Scorecard
maps directly to one in GDPR. Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in OpenSSF Scorecard reaches these. This is the list to scope.
GDPR-Art.24Responsibility of the controller
GDPR-Art.26Joint controllers
GDPR-Art.27Representatives of controllers or processors not established in the Union
GDPR-Art.29Processing under the authority of the controller or processor
GDPR-Art.30Records of processing activities
GDPR-Art.36Prior consultation
GDPR-Art.37Designation of the data protection officer
GDPR-Art.39Tasks of the data protection officer
GDPR-Art.44General principle for transfers
GDPR-Art.46Transfers subject to appropriate safeguards
GDPR-Art.47Binding corporate rules
GDPR-Art.49Derogations for specific situations
Show the 14 you already have
GDPR-Art.10Processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions
GDPR-Art.11Processing which does not require identification
GDPR-Art.25Data protection by design and by default
GDPR-Art.32Security of processing
GDPR-Art.33Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority
GDPR-Art.34Communication of a personal data breach to the data subject
GDPR-Art.35Data protection impact assessment
GDPR-Art.38Position of the data protection officer
GDPR-Art.45Transfers on the basis of an adequacy decision
GDPR-Art.5Principles relating to processing of personal data
GDPR-Art.6Lawfulness of processing
GDPR-Art.7Conditions for consent
GDPR-Art.8Conditions applicable to child's consent
GDPR-Art.9Processing of special categories of personal data
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in OpenSSF Scorecard to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition