Framework overlap

Does NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 cover APRA CPS 220 Risk Management?

You hold NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 and have been told to do APRA CPS 220 Risk Management. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

9% of APRA CPS 220 Risk Management you already have

NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 already covers about 9% of APRA CPS 220 Risk Management, leaving 21 of 23 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 2 New work 21

No control in NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 maps directly to one in APRA CPS 220 Risk Management. Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

CPS220-01
Application and Scope
CPS220-02
Board Responsibility
CPS220-03
Board Risk Committee
CPS220-04
Risk Management Framework
CPS220-05
Risk Management Strategy
CPS220-06
Risk Appetite Statement
CPS220-07
Material Risks Coverage
CPS220-08
Three Lines of Accountability
CPS220-09
Chief Risk Officer
CPS220-10
Risk Management Function
CPS220-12
Risk Culture
CPS220-13
New and Material Changes
CPS220-14
Stress Testing
CPS220-15
ICAAP Linkage
CPS220-16
Risk Reporting
CPS220-17
Group Risk Management
CPS220-19
Notification to APRA
CPS220-20
Declaration to APRA
CPS220-21
Outsourcing and Service Provider Risk
CPS220-22
Operational and Non-Financial Risk
CPS220-23
Documentation and Records
Show the 2 you already have
CPS220-11
Internal Audit
CPS220-18
Comprehensive Review

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in NIST SP 800-53A Rev. 5 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition