Framework overlap

Does NIST SP 800-190 cover Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?

You hold NIST SP 800-190 and have been told to do Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

17% of Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) you already have

NIST SP 800-190 already covers about 17% of Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175), leaving 5 of 6 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 1 Likely covered 0 New work 5

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in NIST SP 800-190 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

PHILCC-2
Computer-Related Offences (Forgery, Fraud, Identity Theft)
PHILCC-3
Content-Related Offences (Cybersex, Child Pornography, Libel, Unsolicited Comms)
PHILCC-4
Corporate Liability and Officer Liability
PHILCC-5
Data Preservation, Disclosure, Search and Seizure Cooperation
PHILCC-6
CICC Liaison and Internal Cybercrime Incident Response
Show the 1 you already have
PHILCC-1
Computer Crime Offences (Illegal Access, Interference, Misuse of Devices)

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in NIST SP 800-190 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition