26% of ISO 50001:2018 you already have
NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 already covers about 26% of ISO 50001:2018, leaving
34 of 46 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 12
New work 34
No control in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3
maps directly to one in ISO 50001:2018. Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 reaches these. This is the list to scope.
3.1Terms related to organization
3.2Terms related to management system
3.3Terms related to requirement
3.4Terms related to performance
3.5Terms related to energy
4.4Energy management system
4.4.5Energy performance indicators
4.4.6Energy objectives, energy targets and energy management action plans
4.5.2Competence, training and awareness
4.5.7Procurement of energy services, products, equipment and energy
4.6.2Evaluation of compliance with legal requirements and other requirements
4.6.3Internal audit of the EnMS
4.6.4Nonconformities, correction, corrective action and preventive action
4.7.2Input to management review
4.7.3Output from management review
6.4Energy performance indicators
7.5Documented information
7.5.2Creating and updating
7.5.3Control of documented information
9.1Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation of energy performance and the
9.1.2Evaluation of compliance with legal requirements and other requirements
Show the 12 you already have
10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
10.2Continual improvement
4.1Understanding the organization and its context
4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
4.3Determining the scope of the energy management system
4.6.1Monitoring, measurement and analysis
5.1Leadership and commitment
8.1Operational planning and control
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition