13% of Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) you already have
NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 already covers about 13% of Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), leaving
28 of 32 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 2
Likely covered 2
New work 28
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 reaches these. This is the list to scope.
7012(b)(1)Covered Defence Information Identification
7012(b)(2)Scope of Protected Systems
BIPA-AUDITPeriodic Audit and Compliance Review
BIPA-EMPLOYEEEmployee Biometric Programs (Timekeeping, Access)
BIPA-EXEMPTStatutory Exemptions
BIPA-INCIDENTIncident Response for Biometric Compromise
BIPA-IRRECOVIrreversible Harm and Special Risk Recognition
BIPA-MINORSMinors and Authorised Representatives
BIPA-PRAPrivate Right of Action and Statutory Damages
BIPA-SEC10-DEFBiometric Identifier and Information Definitions
BIPA-SEC15A-DESTROYDestruction When Purpose Satisfied or Three Years Inactive
BIPA-SEC15A-POLICYWritten Retention and Destruction Policy
BIPA-SEC15B-CONSENTWritten Release (Informed Consent)
BIPA-SEC15B-NOTICEWritten Notice Before Collection
BIPA-SEC15C-PROFITNo Sale, Lease, Trade, or Profit
BIPA-SEC15D-DISCLOSEDisclosure Restrictions
BIPA-SEC15E-STOREReasonable Standard of Care and Storage Protections
BIPA-SEC15aWritten Informed Consent Required
BIPA-SEC15bDisclosure and Profit Prohibition
BIPA-SEC15cDisclosure Restriction
BIPA-SEC15dRetention and Destruction Policy
BIPA-SEC15eStorage and Protection Requirements
BIPA-SEC5-3Private Entity Definition
BIPA-TRAINWorkforce Training
BIPA-VENDORVendor and Processor Contracts
CTDPA-2Applicability Thresholds
MSA-ThresholdRevenue Threshold
Show the 4 you already have
BIPA-SEC5-1Biometric Identifier Definition
BIPA-SEC5-2Biometric Information Definition
MSA-5Definition of Modern Slavery
MSA-CommonwealthCommonwealth Entities
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition