Framework overlap

Does NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 cover Automotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0?

You hold NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 and have been told to do Automotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

19% of Automotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0 you already have

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 already covers about 19% of Automotive SPICE (ASPICE) v4.0, leaving 25 of 31 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 4 Likely covered 2 New work 25

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

HWE.1
Hardware Requirements Analysis
HWE.2
Hardware Design
HWE.3
Hardware Verification
HWE.4
Hardware Qualification Verification
MAN.3
Project Management
MAN.5
Risk Management
MAN.6
Measurement
MLE.4
Machine Learning Model Testing
SEC.1
Cybersecurity Requirements Analysis
SPL.2
Product Release
SUP.1
Quality Assurance
SUP.10
Change Request Management
SUP.9
Problem Resolution Management
SWE.1
Software Requirements Analysis
SWE.2
Software Architectural Design
SWE.3
Software Detailed Design and Unit Construction
SWE.4
Software Unit Verification
SWE.5
Software Component Verification and Integration Verification
SWE.6
Software Verification
SYS.1
Requirements Elicitation
SYS.2
System Requirements Analysis
SYS.3
System Architectural Design
SYS.4
System Integration and Integration Verification
SYS.5
System Verification
VAL.1
System Validation
Show the 6 you already have
ACQ.4
Supplier Monitoring
MLE.1
Machine Learning Requirements Analysis
MLE.3
Machine Learning Training
SUP.8
Configuration Management
MLE.2
Machine Learning Architecture
SUP.11
ML Data Management Support

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition