Framework overlap

Does NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 cover Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

You hold NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and have been told to do Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015). Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

25% of Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) you already have

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 already covers about 25% of Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015), leaving 6 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 2 New work 6

No control in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps directly to one in Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015). Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

LAOS-CC-Content-Offences-Online-Social-Media-Damage-Article-13-Misinformation-National-Security
Laos Cybercrime Content Offences + Online Social Media Damage + Article 13 + Misinformation + National Security
LAOS-CC-Investigation-Procedural-Powers-Inspection-Articles-40-53-MoPS-Search-Seizure-Production
Laos Cybercrime Investigation + Procedural Powers + Inspection + Articles 40-53
LAOS-CC-Penalties-International-Cooperation-Article-56-Fines-Imprisonment-Aggravating-Circumstances
Laos Cybercrime Penalties + International Cooperation + Article 56 + Fines + Imprisonment
LAOS-CC-Prevention-Awareness-Education-Article-20-Public-Campaigns-Capacity-Building
Laos Cybercrime Prevention + Awareness + Education + Article 20 + Public Campaigns + Capacity Building
LAOS-CC-Scope-Application-Law-61-NA-15-July-2015-Lao-National-Assembly-MoPT-7-Chapters-Cybercrime
Laos Cybercrime Law Scope and Application + Law 61/NA + 15 July 2015 + Lao National Assembly + MoPT
LAOS-CC-Substantive-Offences-Unauthorized-Access-Interception-Interference-Data-Articles-8-12
Laos Cybercrime Substantive Offences + Unauthorized Access + Interception + Interference + Articles 8-12
Show the 2 you already have
LAOS-CC-LaoCERT-Incident-Response-National-Cybersecurity-Coordination-Article-22
Laos Cybercrime LaoCERT + Incident Response + National Cybersecurity Coordination + Article 22
LAOS-CC-Network-Security-Information-Security-Obligations-Article-21-Service-Provider-Duties
Laos Cybercrime Network Security + Information Security Obligations + Article 21 + Service Provider Duties

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition