50% of Ghana Cybersecurity Act you already have
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 already covers about 50% of Ghana Cybersecurity Act, leaving
6 of 12 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 6
New work 6
No control in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
maps directly to one in Ghana Cybersecurity Act. Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 reaches these. This is the list to scope.
GhCSA-Budapest-Malabo-AfricaCERT-2024-2025Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention, AfricaCERT and 2024-2025 Status
GhCSA-Child-OnlineProtection-Awareness-Intl-CoopChild Online Protection, Awareness, Education and International Cooperation
GhCSA-Coord-Ghana-DPA-Cybercrime-SectoralCoordination with Ghana DPA 2012, Cybercrime Definitions and Cross-Sectoral Frameworks
GhCSA-Crosswalk-NIST-ISO-27001-SectoralCrosswalk to NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001, ISO 22301 and Sector Standards
GhCSA-Sectoral-Coordination-DPC-NCA-BoGSectoral Coordination - Data Protection Commission, NCA, Bank of Ghana and Other Regulators
GhCSA-Status-2024-2025-Strategy-AIImplementation Status, Cybersecurity Strategy 2024-2028 and 2024-2025 Pipeline
Show the 6 you already have
GhCSA-CII-Designation-Plan-Audit-RiskCII Designation, Registration, Cybersecurity Plan, Audit and Risk Assessment
GhCSA-Cybercrime-Lawful-Access-PreservationCybercrime Offences, Lawful Access and Electronic Evidence Preservation
GhCSA-Implementation-RoadmapImplementation Roadmap - Organizational Roles, Tooling and Metrics
GhCSA-Incident-Reporting-CERT-GHCybersecurity Incident Reporting (24-Hour to CSA) and National CERT-GH Engagement
GhCSA-Scope-CSAGhana-DefsScope, Cyber Security Authority (CSA Ghana) and Key Definitions
GhCSA-Service-Provider-Licensing-ProfessionalCybersecurity Service Provider Licensing and Professional Accreditation
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition