Does NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 cover ASEAN Data Management Framework?

96% of ASEAN Data Management Framework you already have

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 already covers about 96% of ASEAN Data Management Framework, leaving 1 of 27 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 26 Likely covered 0 New work 1

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

ADMF-5.6

Reference recognised security and privacy standards

Show the 26 you already have

ADMF-1.1

Establish data management governance functions

ADMF-1.2

Data management function responsibilities

ADMF-1.3

Business process function responsibilities

ADMF-1.4

Risk management function responsibilities

ADMF-1.5

Executive direction and risk appetite

ADMF-2.1

Leadership commitment in policy (who)

ADMF-2.2

Define objectives, scope and considerations (what and why)

ADMF-2.3

Establish the data management approach (how)

ADMF-2.4

Embed data management in corporate governance and policy

ADMF-3.1

Identify and understand organisational data

ADMF-3.2

Maintain a data inventory

ADMF-3.3

Apply overarching categorisation considerations

ADMF-4.1

Establish a data categorisation matrix

ADMF-4.2

Assess confidentiality, integrity and availability impact

ADMF-4.3

Assess business impact categories

ADMF-4.4

Assign datasets to risk tiers

ADMF-5.1

Implement risk-based protection controls

ADMF-5.2

Apply technical, procedural and physical safeguards

ADMF-5.3

Protect data across the data lifecycle

ADMF-5.4

Build a data protection control matrix

ADMF-5.5

Manage and accept residual risk

ADMF-6.1

Define monitoring and measurement scope

ADMF-6.2

Review controls associated with each category

ADMF-6.3

Review categories assigned to datasets

ADMF-6.4

Test data protection control effectiveness

ADMF-6.5

Update policies, procedures and processes

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair · Today's edition