29% of ISO 37301:2021 you already have
Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements already covers about 29% of ISO 37301:2021, leaving
30 of 42 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 12
New work 30
No control in Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements
maps directly to one in ISO 37301:2021. Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements reaches these. This is the list to scope.
10.1Continual improvement
10.2Nonconformity and corrective action
4.1Understanding the organization and its context
4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
4.3Determining the scope of the compliance management system
5.1Leadership and commitment
5.1.1Governing body and top management
5.3Roles, responsibilities and authorities
6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
6.2Compliance objectives and planning to achieve them
7.5Documented information
7.5.2Creating and updating documented information
7.5.3Control of documented information
8.1Operational planning and control
8.2Establishing controls and procedures
8.4Investigation processes
9.1Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
9.1.2Sources of feedback on compliance performance
9.1.3Development of indicators
9.2.2Internal audit programme
Show the 12 you already have
4.4Compliance management system
4.5Compliance obligations
4.6Compliance risk assessment
5.1.3Compliance governance
9.1.4Compliance reporting
9.3.2Management review inputs
9.3.3Management review results
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition