Framework overlap

Does ISO/SAE 21434 cover OECD AI Principles?

You hold ISO/SAE 21434 and have been told to do OECD AI Principles. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

50% of OECD AI Principles you already have

ISO/SAE 21434 already covers about 50% of OECD AI Principles, leaving 4 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 1 Likely covered 3 New work 4

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO/SAE 21434 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

OECDAI-4
Accountability, Lifecycle Coverage, Documentation, and Record-Keeping
OECDAI-6
Human Oversight, Redress, and Contestation Mechanisms
OECDAI-7
Third-Party AI Audit, Impact Assessments, and Metrics for Trustworthy AI
OECDAI-8
AI Incident Reporting, Regulatory Compliance, Public Reporting, and International Cooperation
Show the 4 you already have
OECDAI-3
Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection
OECDAI-1
Inclusive Growth, Human-Centred Values, Fairness, and Sustainable Development
OECDAI-2
Transparency, Explainability, and Public-Facing Disclosure
OECDAI-5
Data Governance, Training Data Quality, Privacy, and Bias Mitigation

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO/SAE 21434 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition