Framework overlap

Does ISO/SAE 21434 cover Mauritius DPA?

You hold ISO/SAE 21434 and have been told to do Mauritius DPA. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

88% of Mauritius DPA you already have

ISO/SAE 21434 already covers about 88% of Mauritius DPA, leaving 1 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 2 Likely covered 5 New work 1

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO/SAE 21434 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

MU-DPA-Scope-Act-20-2017-Assent-18-December-2017-Effective-15-January-2018-DPO-Mauritius-Convention-108
Mauritius DPA Scope + Act 20 of 2017 + Assent 18 December 2017 + Effective 15 January 2018 + DPO Mauritius + Convention 108+
Show the 7 you already have
MU-DPA-Governance-DPO-Designation-Section-25-DPO-ROPA-DPIA-Codes-Section-38-Commissioner-Registration
Mauritius DPA Governance + DPO + ROPA + DPIA + Codes Section 38 + Commissioner Registration
MU-DPA-Sensitive-Personal-Data-Section-24-Health-Biometric-Genetic-Sexual-Section-25-Children-16
Mauritius DPA Sensitive Data + Section 24 + Health + Biometric + Genetic + Sexual + Section 25 + Children 16
MU-DPA-Cross-Border-Transfer-Section-36-Adequacy-SCC-BCR-Mauritius-Global-Business-IBC-Financial-Services
Mauritius DPA Cross-Border + Section 36 + Adequacy + SCC + BCR + Mauritius Global Business + Financial Services
MU-DPA-Data-Subject-Rights-Sections-26-33-Access-Rectification-Erasure-Restriction-Portability-Objection
Mauritius DPA Subject Rights + Sections 26 to 33 + Access + Rectification + Erasure + Restriction + Portability + Objection
MU-DPA-Enforcement-Commissioner-Section-41-43-MUR-200K-5-Year-Prison-ICT-Appeal-Tribunal-Supreme-Court
Mauritius DPA Enforcement + Commissioner + Section 41 + Section 43 + MUR 200K + 5 Year Prison + ICT Appeal Tribunal + Supreme Court
MU-DPA-Security-Breach-Notification-Section-25-BREACH-72-Hour-Commissioner-Cyber-Security-Strategy
Mauritius DPA Security + Breach Notification + Section 25-BREACH + 72 Hour + Commissioner + Cyber Security Strategy
MU-DPA-Seven-Principles-Section-21-Lawfulness-Purpose-Minimisation-Accuracy-Storage-Integrity-Accountability
Mauritius DPA Seven Principles + Section 21 + Lawfulness + Purpose + Minimisation + Accuracy + Storage + Integrity + Accountability

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO/SAE 21434 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition