Framework overlap

Does ISO/IEC 27011:2024 cover Ontario Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA)?

You hold ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and have been told to do Ontario Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA). Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

13% of Ontario Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) you already have

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 already covers about 13% of Ontario Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA), leaving 7 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 1 Likely covered 0 New work 7

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO/IEC 27011:2024 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

AODACAN-1
AODA Accessibility Policy and Multi-Year Plan
AODACAN-3
Accessibility Training
AODACAN-4
Accessible Websites and Web Content - WCAG 2.0 Level AA
AODACAN-5
Accessible Formats, Communication Supports, Self-Service Kiosks
AODACAN-6
Employment Accessibility, Accommodation, Return to Work, Performance
AODACAN-7
Education, Training Resources, Educational Producers
AODACAN-8
Feedback Process, Emergency Procedures, Compliance Reporting
Show the 1 you already have
AODACAN-2
Accessible Procurement of Goods, Services, Facilities

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition