Framework overlap

Does ISO/IEC 27011:2024 cover ISO 27002:2022?

You hold ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and have been told to do ISO 27002:2022. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

23% of ISO 27002:2022 you already have

ISO/IEC 27011:2024 already covers about 23% of ISO 27002:2022, leaving 66 of 86 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 16 Likely covered 4 New work 66

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO/IEC 27011:2024 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

4.1
Clauses
4.2
Themes and attributes
4.3
Control layout
5.10
Acceptable use of information and other associated assets
5.11
Return of assets
5.12
Classification of information
5.13
Labelling of information
5.14
Information transfer
5.16
Identity management
5.17
Authentication information
5.18
Access rights
5.19
Information security in supplier relationships
5.2
Information security roles and responsibilities
5.20
Addressing information security within supplier agreements
5.21
Managing information security in the ICT supply chain
5.22
Monitoring, review and change management of supplier services
5.23
Information security for use of cloud services
5.24
Information security incident management planning and preparation
5.25
Assessment and decision on information security events
5.26
Response to information security incidents
5.27
Learning from information security incidents
5.28
Collection of evidence
5.29
Information security during disruption
5.31
Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements
5.32
Intellectual property rights
5.33
Protection of records
5.34
Privacy and protection of PII
5.35
Independent review of information security
5.36
Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security
5.37
Documented operating procedures
5.4
Management responsibilities
5.5
Contact with authorities
5.6
Contact with special interest groups
6.1
Screening
6.3
Information security awareness, education and training
6.4
Disciplinary process
6.5
Responsibilities after termination or change of employment
6.6
Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
6.8
Information security event reporting
7.11
Supporting utilities
7.12
Cabling security
7.13
Equipment maintenance
7.14
Secure disposal or re-use of equipment
7.3
Securing offices, rooms and facilities
7.5
Protecting against physical and environmental threats
7.6
Working in secure areas
7.7
Clear desk and clear screen
7.8
Equipment siting and protection
8.10
Information deletion
8.11
Data masking
8.13
Information backup
8.14
Redundancy of information processing facilities
8.17
Clock synchronization
8.18
Use of privileged utility programs
8.19
Installation of software on operational systems
8.20
Networks security
8.23
Web filtering
8.25
Secure development life cycle
8.26
Application security requirements
8.28
Secure coding
8.29
Security testing in development and acceptance
8.30
Outsourced development
8.31
Separation of development, test and production environments
8.33
Test information
8.34
Protection of information systems during audit testing
8.6
Capacity management
Show the 20 you already have
5.1
Policies for information security
5.3
Segregation of duties
5.30
ICT readiness for business continuity
6.2
Terms and conditions of employment
6.7
Remote working
7.1
Physical security perimeters
7.10
Storage media
7.2
Physical entry
8.1
User endpoint devices
8.12
Data leakage prevention
8.16
Monitoring activities
8.21
Security of network services
8.22
Segregation of networks
8.24
Use of cryptography
8.27
Secure system architecture and engineering principles
8.32
Change management
7.4
Physical security monitoring
7.9
Security of assets off-premises
8.15
Logging
8.9
Configuration management

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition