Framework overlap

Does ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 cover ISO 37301:2021?

You hold ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 and have been told to do ISO 37301:2021. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

38% of ISO 37301:2021 you already have

ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 already covers about 38% of ISO 37301:2021, leaving 26 of 42 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 8 Likely covered 8 New work 26

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

10.2
Nonconformity and corrective action
4.1
Understanding the organization and its context
4.2
Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
4.3
Determining the scope of the compliance management system
5.3
Roles, responsibilities and authorities
6.2
Compliance objectives and planning to achieve them
6.3
Planning of changes
7.2
Competence
7.2.3
Training
7.3
Awareness
7.4
Communication
7.5
Documented information
7.5.2
Creating and updating documented information
7.5.3
Control of documented information
8.2
Establishing controls and procedures
8.3
Raising concerns
8.4
Investigation processes
9.1
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
9.1.2
Sources of feedback on compliance performance
9.1.3
Development of indicators
9.1.5
Record-keeping
9.2
Internal audit
9.2.2
Internal audit programme
9.3
Management review
9.3.2
Management review inputs
9.3.3
Management review results
Show the 16 you already have
4.4
Compliance management system
4.5
Compliance obligations
4.6
Compliance risk assessment
5.1.2
Compliance culture
5.1.3
Compliance governance
5.2
Compliance policy
5.3.2
Compliance function
9.1.4
Compliance reporting
10.1
Continual improvement
5.1
Leadership and commitment
5.1.1
Governing body and top management
5.3.4
Personnel
6.1
Actions to address risks and opportunities
7.1
Resources
7.2.2
Employment process
8.1
Operational planning and control

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO/IEC TR 24028:2020 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition