Framework overlap

Does ISO/IEC 42001:2023 cover ISO 27002:2022?

You hold ISO/IEC 42001:2023 and have been told to do ISO 27002:2022. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

17% of ISO 27002:2022 you already have

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 already covers about 17% of ISO 27002:2022, leaving 71 of 86 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 15 New work 71

No control in ISO/IEC 42001:2023 maps directly to one in ISO 27002:2022. Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO/IEC 42001:2023 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

4.1
Clauses
4.2
Themes and attributes
4.3
Control layout
5.10
Acceptable use of information and other associated assets
5.11
Return of assets
5.12
Classification of information
5.14
Information transfer
5.16
Identity management
5.17
Authentication information
5.18
Access rights
5.19
Information security in supplier relationships
5.2
Information security roles and responsibilities
5.20
Addressing information security within supplier agreements
5.21
Managing information security in the ICT supply chain
5.22
Monitoring, review and change management of supplier services
5.23
Information security for use of cloud services
5.24
Information security incident management planning and preparation
5.25
Assessment and decision on information security events
5.26
Response to information security incidents
5.27
Learning from information security incidents
5.28
Collection of evidence
5.29
Information security during disruption
5.30
ICT readiness for business continuity
5.31
Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements
5.32
Intellectual property rights
5.33
Protection of records
5.35
Independent review of information security
5.36
Compliance with policies, rules and standards for information security
5.37
Documented operating procedures
5.5
Contact with authorities
5.6
Contact with special interest groups
6.2
Terms and conditions of employment
6.3
Information security awareness, education and training
6.4
Disciplinary process
6.5
Responsibilities after termination or change of employment
6.7
Remote working
6.8
Information security event reporting
7.10
Storage media
7.11
Supporting utilities
7.12
Cabling security
7.13
Equipment maintenance
7.14
Secure disposal or re-use of equipment
7.3
Securing offices, rooms and facilities
7.5
Protecting against physical and environmental threats
7.6
Working in secure areas
7.7
Clear desk and clear screen
7.8
Equipment siting and protection
7.9
Security of assets off-premises
8.1
User endpoint devices
8.10
Information deletion
8.13
Information backup
8.14
Redundancy of information processing facilities
8.15
Logging
8.16
Monitoring activities
8.17
Clock synchronization
8.19
Installation of software on operational systems
8.20
Networks security
8.21
Security of network services
8.22
Segregation of networks
8.23
Web filtering
8.24
Use of cryptography
8.25
Secure development life cycle
8.26
Application security requirements
8.27
Secure system architecture and engineering principles
8.28
Secure coding
8.29
Security testing in development and acceptance
8.30
Outsourced development
8.31
Separation of development, test and production environments
8.34
Protection of information systems during audit testing
8.6
Capacity management
8.9
Configuration management
Show the 15 you already have
5.1
Policies for information security
5.13
Labelling of information
5.3
Segregation of duties
5.34
Privacy and protection of PII
5.4
Management responsibilities
6.1
Screening
6.6
Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
7.1
Physical security perimeters
7.2
Physical entry
7.4
Physical security monitoring
8.11
Data masking
8.12
Data leakage prevention
8.18
Use of privileged utility programs
8.32
Change management
8.33
Test information

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO/IEC 42001:2023 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition