50% of ISO 14004:2016 you already have
ISO 50001:2018 already covers about 50% of ISO 14004:2016, leaving
20 of 40 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 14
Likely covered 6
New work 20
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in ISO 50001:2018 reaches these. This is the list to scope.
10.3.1Opportunities for improvement
10.3.2Implementation of continual improvement
4.2.2Determining relevant interested parties
4.2.3Determining relevant needs and expectations of relevant interested parties
4.2.4Determining compliance obligations
4.2.5Use and application of the needs and expectations of interested parties
5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
6.1.2Environmental aspects
6.1.3Compliance obligations
6.2Environmental objectives and planning to achieve them
6.2.2Establishing environmental objectives
6.2.3Planning actions to achieve environmental objectives
6.2.4Performance indicators
7.4.2Internal communication
7.4.3External communication
8.1.3Establishing operational controls
8.2E mergency p rep arednes s and res p o ns e
9.1M o nito ring, meas urement, analys is and evaluatio n
Show the 20 you already have
10.3Continual improvement
3.1Terms related to organization and leadership
3.4Terms related to performance evaluation and improvement
4.1Understanding the organization and its context
4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
5.1Leadership and commitment
7.5Documented information
7.5.2Creating and updating
7.5.3Control of documented information
8.1Operational planning and control
8.1.1General guidance: Operational control
3.2Terms related to planning
3.3Terms related to support and operation
9.1.2Evaluation of compliance
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 50001:2018 to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition