Framework overlap

Does ISO 41001:2018 cover ISO 37301:2021?

You hold ISO 41001:2018 and have been told to do ISO 37301:2021. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

81% of ISO 37301:2021 you already have

ISO 41001:2018 already covers about 81% of ISO 37301:2021, leaving 8 of 42 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 17 Likely covered 17 New work 8

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 41001:2018 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

5.1.1
Governing body and top management
5.3.4
Personnel
7.2.2
Employment process
7.2.3
Training
7.5.2
Creating and updating documented information
7.5.3
Control of documented information
9.1.3
Development of indicators
9.1.5
Record-keeping
Show the 34 you already have
10.1
Continual improvement
10.2
Nonconformity and corrective action
4.1
Understanding the organization and its context
4.2
Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
4.3
Determining the scope of the compliance management system
5.1
Leadership and commitment
5.3
Roles, responsibilities and authorities
6.1
Actions to address risks and opportunities
6.3
Planning of changes
7.5
Documented information
8.1
Operational planning and control
9.1
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
9.2
Internal audit
9.2.2
Internal audit programme
9.3
Management review
9.3.2
Management review inputs
9.3.3
Management review results
4.4
Compliance management system
4.5
Compliance obligations
4.6
Compliance risk assessment
5.1.2
Compliance culture
5.1.3
Compliance governance
5.2
Compliance policy
5.3.2
Compliance function
6.2
Compliance objectives and planning to achieve them
7.1
Resources
7.2
Competence
7.3
Awareness
7.4
Communication
8.2
Establishing controls and procedures
8.3
Raising concerns
8.4
Investigation processes
9.1.2
Sources of feedback on compliance performance
9.1.4
Compliance reporting

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 41001:2018 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition