50% of OECD AI Principles you already have
ISO 31000:2018 already covers about 50% of OECD AI Principles, leaving
4 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 4
New work 4
No control in ISO 31000:2018
maps directly to one in OECD AI Principles. Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in ISO 31000:2018 reaches these. This is the list to scope.
OECDAI-4Accountability, Lifecycle Coverage, Documentation, and Record-Keeping
OECDAI-6Human Oversight, Redress, and Contestation Mechanisms
OECDAI-7Third-Party AI Audit, Impact Assessments, and Metrics for Trustworthy AI
OECDAI-8AI Incident Reporting, Regulatory Compliance, Public Reporting, and International Cooperation
Show the 4 you already have
OECDAI-1Inclusive Growth, Human-Centred Values, Fairness, and Sustainable Development
OECDAI-2Transparency, Explainability, and Public-Facing Disclosure
OECDAI-3Robustness, Security, Safety, and Adversarial Attack Protection
OECDAI-5Data Governance, Training Data Quality, Privacy, and Bias Mitigation
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 31000:2018 to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition