Framework overlap

Does ISO 31000:2018 cover Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes?

You hold ISO 31000:2018 and have been told to do Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

25% of Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes you already have

ISO 31000:2018 already covers about 25% of Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes, leaving 27 of 36 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 1 Likely covered 8 New work 27

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 31000:2018 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

AEO-1
AEO programme eligibility and legal basis
AEO-10
Security training and awareness
AEO-11
Risk management and threat assessment
AEO-12
Crisis management and incident recovery
AEO-13
Self-assessment and internal audit
AEO-14
Customs procedures and declaration accuracy
AEO-15
Mutual recognition arrangements
AEO-16
AEO validation and re-validation
AEO-17
Notification of changes
AEO-18
Trade facilitation benefits realisation
AEO-19
Suspension, withdrawal and revocation
AEO-20
AEO governance and accountability
AEO-21
Customs broker and forwarder oversight
AEO-22
Sanctions and restricted party screening
AEO-23
Documentation accuracy and tariff classification
AEO-3
Commercial and transport records system
AEO-6
Cargo security and conveyance integrity
AEO-7
Business partner security
AEO-8
Personnel security
AEO-9
Information security and IT systems
P1-S3
Outbound inspection
P1-S4
Mutual recognition (Customs-to-Customs)
P2-S2
Security standards
P2-S4
Technology utilization
P2-S6
Trade facilitation benefits
P3-S1
Inter-agency cooperation
P3-S2
Single window facilitation
Show the 9 you already have
P2-S5
Communication
AEO-2
Customs compliance record
AEO-4
Financial solvency
AEO-5
Premises security and safety standards
P1-S1
Advance electronic information
P1-S2
Risk management
P2-S1
Partnership programme (AEO)
P2-S3
Authorization and validation
P3-S3
Data sharing

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 31000:2018 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition