Framework overlap

Does ISO 27043 cover Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act?

You hold ISO 27043 and have been told to do Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

63% of Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act you already have

ISO 27043 already covers about 63% of Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act, leaving 3 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 5 New work 3

No control in ISO 27043 maps directly to one in Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act. Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 27043 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

INCDPA-Coord-USStatePrivacy-VCDPA-CPA-CTDPA-CCPA-Federal-FTC-DPDP-GDPR-International
Indiana CDPA Coordination - US State Privacy Laws (Virginia/Colorado/Connecticut/Utah/Texas/Iowa+) + Federal Sectoral (HIPAA/GLBA/FCRA/FERPA/COPPA) + FTC Section 5 + GDPR + India D
INCDPA-Enforcement-30DayCure-AttorneyGeneralOnly-NoPrivateRight-CivilPenalties-7500-PerViolation
Indiana CDPA Enforcement - Attorney General Exclusive + 30-Day Cure Period + No Private Right of Action + Civil Penalties Up to USD 7500 Per Violation + Investigation + Compliance
INCDPA-Scope-SEA5-2023-Effective-1Jan2026-IC-24-15-Applicability-100K-25K-50pct-Exemptions
Indiana CDPA Scope + Senate Enrolled Act 5 of 2023 + Effective 1 January 2026 + IC 24-15 + Applicability Thresholds + Exemptions GLBA/HIPAA/FCRA/FERPA + B2B/Employee Carve-Outs
Show the 5 you already have
INCDPA-ConsumerRights-Access-Correction-Deletion-Portability-OptOut-TargetedAd-Sale-Profiling-Appeal-45Day
Indiana CDPA Consumer Rights - Access + Correction + Deletion + Portability + Opt-Out of Targeted Advertising/Sale/Profiling + 45-Day Response + 45-Day Extension + Authorised Agent
INCDPA-Controller-PrivacyNotice-PurposeLimitation-DataMinimisation-Transparency-LawfulBasis
Indiana CDPA Controller Obligations - Privacy Notice + Purpose Limitation + Data Minimisation + Transparency + Lawful Basis + Reasonable + Adequate + Relevant + Limited to What is
INCDPA-Processor-Contracts-DPA-Subprocessor-Audit-Confidentiality-EndOfContract
Indiana CDPA Processor Contracts - Data Processing Agreement (DPA) + Required Provisions + Subprocessor Approval + Confidentiality + End of Contract Deletion + Audit Rights + Assis
INCDPA-Security-ReasonablePractices-Breach-Notification-Records-Encryption-Pseudonymisation
Indiana CDPA Security + Reasonable Practices + Breach Notification + Indiana Breach Notification Law (IC 24-4.9) + Records + Encryption + Pseudonymisation + De-Identification
INCDPA-SensitiveData-Children-Consent-COPPA-DataProtectionAssessment-DPIA
Indiana CDPA Sensitive Data + Consent for Sensitive Categories + Children Under 13 + COPPA Coordination + Data Protection Assessment (DPA) + High-Risk Processing

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 27043 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition