Framework overlap

Does ISO 27019 cover Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?

You hold ISO 27019 and have been told to do Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

27% of Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions you already have

ISO 27019 already covers about 27% of Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions, leaving 8 of 11 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 2 Likely covered 1 New work 8

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 27019 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

JP-FSA-CYB-Business-Continuity-Cyber-Resilience-RTO-RPO-Backup-Immutable-Air-Gapped-Disaster-Recovery-Ransomware-Resistance
Japan FSA Cybersecurity Business Continuity + Cyber Resilience + RTO + RPO + Backup + Immutable + Air-Gapped + Disaster Recovery + Ransomware Resistance + Operational Resilience +
JP-FSA-CYB-Cybersecurity-Maturity-Self-Assessment-Tool-Annual-Submission-Risk-Tier-Based-Tier1-Tier2-Tier3
Japan FSA Cybersecurity Maturity Self-Assessment Tool + Annual Submission + Risk-Tier-Based + Tier 1 Foundational + Tier 2 Enhanced + Tier 3 Advanced + FSA Inspection + Plan-Do-Che
JP-FSA-CYB-Identity-Access-Management-Privileged-Access-MFA-Zero-Trust-Just-In-Time-Banking-Customer-Authentication
Japan FSA Cybersecurity Identity and Access Management + Privileged Access + MFA + Zero Trust + Just-In-Time + Banking Customer Authentication + Risk-Based Authentication + Out-of-
JP-FSA-CYB-Incident-Notification-FSA-30-Days-Customer-Disclosure-Banking-Act-Article-52-2-Securities-Article-19-Insurance-Article-100-2
Japan FSA Cyber Incident Notification + 30-Day SLA + Customer Disclosure + Banking Act Article 52-2 + Securities Article 19 + Insurance Article 100-2 + APPI Article 26 Breach + Mat
JP-FSA-CYB-Risk-Management-NIST-CSF-FFIEC-Aligned-Identify-Protect-Detect-Respond-Recover-Govern-Plan-Do-Check-Act
Japan FSA Cybersecurity Risk Management Framework + NIST CSF 2.0 Aligned + FFIEC Crosswalk + Identify Protect Detect Respond Recover Govern + ISO 27001 ISMS + Plan-Do-Check-Act + I
JP-FSA-CYB-Scope-Guidelines-Cyber-Security-Financial-Institutions-2015-2019-2022-2024-Banking-Insurance-Securities-FISC
Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines Scope + Cyber Security Reinforcement at Financial Institutions + 2015 + 2019 + 2022 + 2024 Updates + Banking + Insurance + Securities + Funds + S
JP-FSA-CYB-Third-Party-Outsourcing-Cyber-Risk-Cloud-Service-Provider-Due-Diligence-Audit-Right-Sub-Processor-Visibility-Concentration-Risk
Japan FSA Cybersecurity Third Party + Outsourcing Cyber Risk + Cloud Service Provider Due Diligence + Audit Right + Sub-Processor Visibility + Concentration Risk + Data Sovereignty
JP-FSA-CYB-Vulnerability-Management-Patching-CVE-Risk-Based-Prioritisation-Penetration-Testing-Red-Team
Japan FSA Cybersecurity Vulnerability Management + Patching + CVE Tracking + Risk-Based Prioritisation + Penetration Testing + Red-Team + Bug Bounty + Coordinated Vulnerability Dis
Show the 3 you already have
JP-FSA-CYB-Incident-Response-Playbooks-Containment-Eradication-Recovery-Post-Mortem-Tabletop-CSIRT
Japan FSA Cybersecurity Incident Response + Playbooks + Containment + Eradication + Recovery + Post-Mortem + Tabletop Exercises + CSIRT + FSA Notification + Customer Communication
JP-FSA-CYB-Security-Monitoring-SOC-Operations-SIEM-EDR-MDR-XDR-24x7-Detection-Alert-Triage
Japan FSA Cybersecurity Security Monitoring + SOC 24x7 Operations + SIEM + EDR + MDR + XDR + Detection + Alert Triage + Threat Hunting + Incident Response Integration + Threat Inte
JP-FSA-CYB-Cybersecurity-Exercises-Drills-Annual-Tabletop-Industry-Wide-Exercise-Delta-Wall-FSA-Coordinated-Sector
Japan FSA Cybersecurity Exercises + Drills + Annual Tabletop + Industry-Wide Exercise + Delta Wall + FSA Coordinated Sector-Wide + FISC Drills + Cross-Sector Crisis Coordination +

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 27019 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition