Framework overlap

Does ISO 27019 cover ISO 8000?

You hold ISO 27019 and have been told to do ISO 8000. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

11% of ISO 8000 you already have

ISO 27019 already covers about 11% of ISO 8000, leaving 25 of 28 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 3 New work 25

No control in ISO 27019 maps directly to one in ISO 8000. Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 27019 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

ISO-8000-DQM-01
Quality Framework
ISO-8000-DQM-02
Process Maturity
ISO-8000-DQM-03
Master Data Quality
ISO8000-100
Master Data Exchange Overview
ISO8000-110
Master Data: Syntax, Semantic Encoding, and Conformance
ISO8000-115
Quality Identifiers
ISO8000-116
Application of Authoritative Legal Entity Identifiers
ISO8000-120
Master Data: Provenance
ISO8000-130
Master Data: Accuracy
ISO8000-140
Master Data: Completeness
ISO8000-150
Master Data Quality Management Framework
ISO8000-2
Vocabulary
ISO8000-311
Application of Product Data Quality for Manufacturing
ISO8000-61
Data Quality Management Process Reference Model
ISO8000-62
Organizational Data Quality Management Maturity
ISO8000-63
Data Quality Management Process Measurement
ISO8000-64
Data Quality Management Maturity Assessment Indicators
ISO8000-65
Data Quality Management Maturity Assessment Method
ISO8000-66
Assessment of Data Quality Management in Manufacturing
ISO8000-8
Information and Data Quality Concepts
ISO8000-DG
Data Governance Integration
ISO8000-DQM-01
Data Quality Management System
ISO8000-DQM-03
Process Maturity
ISO8000-MDG-02
Data Quality Measurement
ISO8000-MON
Continuous Data Quality Monitoring
Show the 3 you already have
ISO8000-DQM-02
Data Quality Dimensions
ISO8000-MDG-01
Master Data Quality
ISO8000-MDG-03
Continuous Improvement

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 27019 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition