Framework overlap

Does ISO 27019 cover ISO 22318?

You hold ISO 27019 and have been told to do ISO 22318. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

14% of ISO 22318 you already have

ISO 27019 already covers about 14% of ISO 22318, leaving 31 of 36 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 3 Likely covered 2 New work 31

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 27019 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

ISO22318-01
Business continuity policy
ISO22318-02
BCM program scope and objectives
ISO22318-03
Resource allocation for BCM
ISO22318-04
BCM roles and responsibilities
ISO22318-05
Management commitment to BCM
ISO22318-06
Business impact analysis methodology
ISO22318-07
Critical activity identification
ISO22318-09
Resource requirements assessment
ISO22318-10
Interdependency mapping
ISO22318-11
Continuity strategy development
ISO22318-16
Exercise program development
ISO22318-17
Tabletop and simulation exercises
ISO22318-18
Full-scale testing procedures
ISO22318-19
Post-exercise review and improvement
ISO22318-20
Plan maintenance and update
ISO22318-4.1
Supply Chain Continuity Programme
ISO22318-4.2
Supply Chain Risk Appetite
ISO22318-5.1
Supplier Identification and Mapping
ISO22318-5.2
Supplier Criticality Assessment
ISO22318-5.3
Supplier Dependency Analysis
ISO22318-5.4
Supplier Continuity Requirements
ISO22318-5.5
Supplier Due Diligence
ISO22318-6.1
Supply Chain Continuity Strategies
ISO22318-6.2
Alternative Supplier Arrangements
ISO22318-6.3
Inventory and Buffer Stock Strategy
ISO22318-7.1
Supplier Continuity Plans
ISO22318-7.2
Communication and Coordination
ISO22318-8.1
Supplier Continuity Exercising
ISO22318-8.2
Supplier Performance Monitoring
ISO22318-9.1
Concentration and Systemic Risk Review
ISO22318-9.2
Continual Improvement of Supply Chain Continuity
Show the 5 you already have
ISO22318-08
Recovery time and point objectives
ISO22318-12
Recovery strategy for critical activities
ISO22318-14
Supply chain continuity
ISO22318-13
Alternate site and resource planning
ISO22318-15
Communication strategy during disruption

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 27019 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition