Framework overlap

Does ISO 27017 cover ISO 8000?

You hold ISO 27017 and have been told to do ISO 8000. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

11% of ISO 8000 you already have

ISO 27017 already covers about 11% of ISO 8000, leaving 25 of 28 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 2 Likely covered 1 New work 25

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 27017 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

ISO-8000-DQM-01
Quality Framework
ISO-8000-DQM-02
Process Maturity
ISO-8000-DQM-03
Master Data Quality
ISO8000-100
Master Data Exchange Overview
ISO8000-110
Master Data: Syntax, Semantic Encoding, and Conformance
ISO8000-115
Quality Identifiers
ISO8000-116
Application of Authoritative Legal Entity Identifiers
ISO8000-120
Master Data: Provenance
ISO8000-130
Master Data: Accuracy
ISO8000-140
Master Data: Completeness
ISO8000-150
Master Data Quality Management Framework
ISO8000-2
Vocabulary
ISO8000-311
Application of Product Data Quality for Manufacturing
ISO8000-61
Data Quality Management Process Reference Model
ISO8000-62
Organizational Data Quality Management Maturity
ISO8000-63
Data Quality Management Process Measurement
ISO8000-64
Data Quality Management Maturity Assessment Indicators
ISO8000-65
Data Quality Management Maturity Assessment Method
ISO8000-66
Assessment of Data Quality Management in Manufacturing
ISO8000-8
Information and Data Quality Concepts
ISO8000-DG
Data Governance Integration
ISO8000-DQM-01
Data Quality Management System
ISO8000-DQM-03
Process Maturity
ISO8000-MDG-02
Data Quality Measurement
ISO8000-MON
Continuous Data Quality Monitoring
Show the 3 you already have
ISO8000-DQM-02
Data Quality Dimensions
ISO8000-MDG-03
Continuous Improvement
ISO8000-MDG-01
Master Data Quality

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 27017 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition