Framework overlap

Does ISO 27017 cover GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6?

You hold ISO 27017 and have been told to do GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

8% of GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 you already have

ISO 27017 already covers about 8% of GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6, leaving 11 of 12 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 1 New work 11

No control in ISO 27017 maps directly to one in GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6. Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 27017 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

GGAP-2024-2025-Pipeline-EUGreenDeal-CSRD-AI
GLOBALG.A.P. IFA v6 2024-2025 Pipeline: EU Green Deal, CSRD, EUDR, AI and Sustainability
GGAP-AddOns-GRASP-SPRING-Planet-Forest
GLOBALG.A.P. IFA v6 Add-Ons: GRASP, SPRING, Planet Pro, Forest Responsible and Retailer-Specific
GGAP-Certification-CB-Auditing-MajorMinorMust
GLOBALG.A.P. IFA v6 Certification Bodies, Audit Lifecycle and Compliance Categories
GGAP-Crosswalk-GFSI-FSSC22000-BRCGS-IFS-SQF
GLOBALG.A.P. IFA v6 Crosswalk to GFSI, FSSC 22000, BRCGS, IFS, SQF, ISO 22000 and Codex
GGAP-IFA-CropsBase-Production-PPP-IPM
GLOBALG.A.P. IFA v6 Crops Base (CB): Propagation, Soil, Water, IPM, PPP, Fertilizer and Harvest
GGAP-IFA-LivestockBase-Aquaculture-ProductSpecific
GLOBALG.A.P. IFA v6 Livestock Base (LB), Aquaculture Base (AB) and Product-Specific Standards
GGAP-IFA-v6-Scheme-GFSI-Versions
GLOBALG.A.P. IFA v6 Scheme Structure, GFSI Recognition and Version Lineage
GGAP-Implementation-Roadmap-CIPRO-IT-Smart
GLOBALG.A.P. IFA v6 Implementation Roadmap, CIPRO IT-System, Producer Roles
GGAP-Sectoral-Geographic-Adoption-200K-130Countries
GLOBALG.A.P. IFA v6 Sectoral + Geographic Adoption (~200K Producers in 130+ Countries)
GGAP-Status-FoodPLUS-Governance-StakeholderEngagement
GLOBALG.A.P. Status, FoodPLUS Governance, Stakeholder Engagement and Future Roadmap
GGAP-Sub-Schemes-CFM-LOG-CoC-PoC-Localgap
GLOBALG.A.P. Sub-Schemes: CFM, Logistics, CoC, PoC, localg.a.p. and Special Standards
Show the 1 you already have
GGAP-IFA-AllFarmBase-Mgmt-Workers-Env-Trace
GLOBALG.A.P. IFA v6 All Farm Base (AF): Management, Workers, Environment, Traceability and Food Safety

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 27017 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition