Framework overlap

Does ISO 22301:2019 cover ISO/IEC 38500:2024?

You hold ISO 22301:2019 and have been told to do ISO/IEC 38500:2024. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

100% of ISO/IEC 38500:2024 you already have

ISO 22301:2019 already covers about 100% of ISO/IEC 38500:2024, leaving 0 of 60 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 11 Likely covered 49 New work 0

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 22301:2019 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

Nothing. Every control is reached.

Show the 60 you already have
4.1.2
Effective performance
4.1.3
Responsible stewardship
5.10
Risk governance
5.10.3
Outcomes
5.11.3
Outcomes
5.12.3
Outcomes
5.7.3
Outcomes
5.8.3
Outcomes
5.9.3
Outcomes
6.3
Management of IT practice
7.2.4
Policy
4.1
Outcomes of good governance of IT
4.1.4
Ethical behaviour
4.2
Principles, model and framework
5.10.1
Principle
5.10.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.11
Social responsibility
5.11.1
Principle
5.11.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.12
Viability and performance over time
5.12.1
Principle
5.12.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.2.1
Principle
5.2.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.2.3
Outcomes
5.3
Value generation
5.3.1
Principle
5.3.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.3.3
Outcomes
5.4.1
Principle
5.4.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.4.3
Outcomes
5.5
Oversight
5.5.1
Principle
5.5.3
Outcomes
5.6
Accountability
5.6.1
Principle
5.6.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.6.3
Outcomes
5.7
Stakeholder engagement
5.7.1
Principle
5.7.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.8
Leadership
5.8.1
Principle
5.8.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.9
Data and decisions
5.9.1
Principle
5.9.2
Governance implications for use of IT
6.2
Governance of IT practice
6.2.1
Engage stakeholders
6.2.2
Evaluate
6.2.3
Direct
6.2.4
Monitor
6.4
Framework for the governance of IT
7.2
Elements of the framework
7.2.2
Direction
7.2.3
Capability
7.2.5
Delegation
7.2.6
Performance
7.2.7
Accountability

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 22301:2019 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition