Framework overlap

Does ISO 19011 cover ISO 37001:2016?

You hold ISO 19011 and have been told to do ISO 37001:2016. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

36% of ISO 37001:2016 you already have

ISO 19011 already covers about 36% of ISO 37001:2016, leaving 25 of 39 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 4 Likely covered 10 New work 25

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 19011 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

4.2
Understanding the needs and expectations of stakeholders
4.3
Determining the scope of the anti-bribery management system
4.4
Anti-bribery management system
4.5
Bribery risk assessment
5.1
Leadership and commitment
5.1.1
Governing body
5.1.2
Top management
5.2
Anti-bribery policy
5.3.2
Anti-bribery compliance function
6.1
Actions to address risks and opportunities
6.2
Anti-bribery objectives andISO planning
7.2
Competence
7.3
Awareness and training
7.5
Documented information
7.5.3
Control of documented information
8.10
Investigating and dealing with bribery
8.3
Financial controls
8.6
Anti-bribery commitments
8.7
Gifts, hospitality, donations and similar benefits
8.8
Managing inadequacy of anti-bribery controls
9.2
Internal audit
9.3
Management review
9.3.1
Top management review
9.3.2
Governing body review
9.4
Review by anti-bribery compliance function
Show the 14 you already have
10.1
Nonconformity and corrective action
5.3
Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
8.1
Operational planning and control
9.1
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
10.2
Continual improvement
4.1
Understanding the organization and its context
5.3.1
Roles and responsibilities
7.2.2
Employment process
7.4
Communication
7.5.2
Creating and updating
8.2
Due diligence
8.4
Non-financial controls
8.5
Implementation of anti-bribery controls by controlled organizations and by
8.9
Raising concerns

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 19011 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition