Framework overlap

Does ISO 19011:2018 cover ISO 37301:2021?

You hold ISO 19011:2018 and have been told to do ISO 37301:2021. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

81% of ISO 37301:2021 you already have

ISO 19011:2018 already covers about 81% of ISO 37301:2021, leaving 8 of 42 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 18 Likely covered 16 New work 8

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 19011:2018 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

10.2
Nonconformity and corrective action
6.2
Compliance objectives and planning to achieve them
7.1
Resources
7.3
Awareness
8.1
Operational planning and control
8.4
Investigation processes
9.1
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
9.1.5
Record-keeping
Show the 34 you already have
10.1
Continual improvement
4.1
Understanding the organization and its context
5.1.1
Governing body and top management
5.3
Roles, responsibilities and authorities
5.3.4
Personnel
6.1
Actions to address risks and opportunities
6.3
Planning of changes
7.2
Competence
7.2.2
Employment process
7.2.3
Training
7.4
Communication
7.5.2
Creating and updating documented information
7.5.3
Control of documented information
8.2
Establishing controls and procedures
8.3
Raising concerns
9.2
Internal audit
9.2.2
Internal audit programme
9.3.3
Management review results
4.2
Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
4.3
Determining the scope of the compliance management system
4.4
Compliance management system
4.5
Compliance obligations
4.6
Compliance risk assessment
5.1
Leadership and commitment
5.1.2
Compliance culture
5.1.3
Compliance governance
5.2
Compliance policy
5.3.2
Compliance function
7.5
Documented information
9.1.2
Sources of feedback on compliance performance
9.1.3
Development of indicators
9.1.4
Compliance reporting
9.3
Management review
9.3.2
Management review inputs

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 19011:2018 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition