Framework overlap

Does ISO 19011:2018 cover ISO 10006:2003?

You hold ISO 19011:2018 and have been told to do ISO 10006:2003. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

35% of ISO 10006:2003 you already have

ISO 19011:2018 already covers about 35% of ISO 10006:2003, leaving 11 of 17 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 1 Likely covered 5 New work 11

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 19011:2018 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

4.1
Project characteristics
4.2
Quality management systems
5.1
Management commitment
5.2
Strategic process
6.1
Resource-related processes
7.2
Interdependency-related processes
7.4
Time-related processes
7.5
Cost-related processes
7.7
Risk-related processes
7.8
Purchasing-related processes
8.2
Measurement and analysis
Show the 6 you already have
5.3
Management reviews and progress evaluations
6.2
Personnel-related processes
7.3
Scope-related processes
7.6
Communication-related processes
8.1
Improvement-related processes
8.3
Continual improvement

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 19011:2018 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition