Framework overlap

Does ISO 15189:2022 cover Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements?

You hold ISO 15189:2022 and have been told to do Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

63% of Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements you already have

ISO 15189:2022 already covers about 63% of Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements, leaving 3 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 1 Likely covered 4 New work 3

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 15189:2022 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

NGCB-2
Cybersecurity Best Practices Framework Adoption
NGCB-3
Risk Assessment, Risk Management, and Ongoing Risk Monitoring
NGCB-4
Designated Cybersecurity Officer and Personnel Training
Show the 5 you already have
NGCB-6
Incident Response, 72-Hour NGCB Notification, and Independent Investigation
NGCB-1
Regulation 5.260 Scope, Applicability, and Licensee Categories
NGCB-5
Technical Security Controls - Access + Network + Encryption + Vulnerability + Logging
NGCB-7
Patron and Employee Data Protection + Data Inventory + Vendor Management
NGCB-8
Annual Independent Cybersecurity Assessment + Reporting + Board Oversight

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 15189:2022 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition