Framework overlap

Does ISO 10005:2005 cover ISO/IEC 38500:2024?

You hold ISO 10005:2005 and have been told to do ISO/IEC 38500:2024. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

70% of ISO/IEC 38500:2024 you already have

ISO 10005:2005 already covers about 70% of ISO/IEC 38500:2024, leaving 18 of 60 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 15 Likely covered 27 New work 18

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 10005:2005 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

5.10.1
Principle
5.10.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.11.1
Principle
5.11.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.12.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.2.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.3.1
Principle
5.3.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.4.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.6.1
Principle
5.6.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.7.1
Principle
5.7.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.8.2
Governance implications for use of IT
5.9.2
Governance implications for use of IT
6.2.2
Evaluate
6.3
Management of IT practice
7.2.6
Performance
Show the 42 you already have
5.10.3
Outcomes
5.11
Social responsibility
5.11.3
Outcomes
5.12
Viability and performance over time
5.12.1
Principle
5.12.3
Outcomes
5.2.1
Principle
5.2.3
Outcomes
5.3.3
Outcomes
5.4.3
Outcomes
5.5.3
Outcomes
5.6.3
Outcomes
5.7.3
Outcomes
5.8.3
Outcomes
5.9.3
Outcomes
4.1
Outcomes of good governance of IT
4.1.2
Effective performance
4.1.3
Responsible stewardship
4.1.4
Ethical behaviour
4.2
Principles, model and framework
5.10
Risk governance
5.3
Value generation
5.4.1
Principle
5.5
Oversight
5.5.1
Principle
5.6
Accountability
5.7
Stakeholder engagement
5.8
Leadership
5.8.1
Principle
5.9
Data and decisions
5.9.1
Principle
6.2
Governance of IT practice
6.2.1
Engage stakeholders
6.2.3
Direct
6.2.4
Monitor
6.4
Framework for the governance of IT
7.2
Elements of the framework
7.2.2
Direction
7.2.3
Capability
7.2.4
Policy
7.2.5
Delegation
7.2.7
Accountability

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 10005:2005 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition