Framework overlap

Does ISO 10005:2005 cover ISO 22000:2018?

You hold ISO 10005:2005 and have been told to do ISO 22000:2018. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

24% of ISO 22000:2018 you already have

ISO 10005:2005 already covers about 24% of ISO 22000:2018, leaving 42 of 55 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 13 New work 42

No control in ISO 10005:2005 maps directly to one in ISO 22000:2018. Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in ISO 10005:2005 reaches these. This is the list to scope.

10.1
Nonconformity and corrective action
10.2
Continual improvement
10.3
Update of the food safety management system
4.1
Understanding the organization and its context
4.2
Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
4.3
Determining the scope of the food safety management system
5.1
Leadership and commitment
5.2.2
Communicating the food safety policy
5.3
Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
6.1
Actions to address risks and opportunities
6.3
Planning of changes
7.1.3
Infrastructure
7.1.4
Work environment
7.1.5
Externally developed elements of the food safety management system
7.1.6
Control of externally provided processes, products or services
7.2
Competence
7.3
Awareness
7.4
Communication
7.4.2
External communication
7.4.3
Internal communication
7.5
Documented information
7.5.3
Control of documented information
8.1
Operational planning and control
8.4
Emergency preparedness and response
8.4.2
Handling of emergencies and incidents
8.5.3
Validation of control measure(s) and combinations of control measures
8.6
Updating the information specifying the PRPs and the hazard control plan
8.7
Control of monitoring and measuring
8.8
Verification related to PRPs and the hazard control plan
8.8.1
Verification
8.8.2
Analysis of results of verification activities
8.9
Control of product and process nonconformities
8.9.2
Corrections
8.9.3
Corrective actions
8.9.4
Handling of potentially unsafe products
8.9.5
Withdrawal/recall
9.1
Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
9.1.2
Analysis and evaluation
9.2
Internal audit
9.3
Management review
9.3.2
Management review input
9.3.3
Management review output
Show the 13 you already have
4.4
Food safety management system
5.2
Policy
5.2.1
Establishing the food safety policy
6.2
Objectives of the food safety management system and planning to achieve them
7.1
Resources
7.1.2
People
7.5.2
Creating and updating
8.2
Prerequisite programmes (PRPs)
8.3
Traceability system
8.5
Hazard control
8.5.1
Preliminary steps to enable hazard analysis
8.5.2
Hazard analysis
8.5.4
Hazard control plan (HACCP/OPRP plan)

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in ISO 10005:2005 to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition