Framework overlap

Does GDPR cover UK Gambling Commission?

You hold GDPR and have been told to do UK Gambling Commission. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

40% of UK Gambling Commission you already have

GDPR already covers about 40% of UK Gambling Commission, leaving 3 of 5 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 0 Likely covered 2 New work 3

No control in GDPR maps directly to one in UK Gambling Commission. Everything counted as covered is covered because both map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather than a lookup.

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in GDPR reaches these. This is the list to scope.

UKGAMBLE-2
Information Security Management
UKGAMBLE-3
Technical Security Controls
UKGAMBLE-5
Customer Protection and Anti-Money Laundering
Show the 2 you already have
UKGAMBLE-1
Scope and Applicability to Licensees
UKGAMBLE-4
Resilience and Incident Response

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in GDPR to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition