63% of SWIFT CSCF you already have
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) already covers about 63% of SWIFT CSCF, leaving
3 of 8 controls as genuinely new work.
Already covered 0
Likely covered 5
New work 3
No control in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)
maps directly to one in SWIFT CSCF. Everything counted as covered is covered because both
map to the same third standard, which is what a crosswalk is, but it is an inference rather
than a lookup.
What is genuinely new work
Nothing in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) reaches these. This is the list to scope.
SWIFTCSCF-2Reduce Attack Surface and Vulnerabilities (Objective 2)
SWIFTCSCF-5Manage Identities and Segregate Privileges (Objective 5)
SWIFTCSCF-8Annual Attestation and Independent Assessment
Show the 5 you already have
SWIFTCSCF-1Restrict Internet Access and Protect Critical Systems (Objective 1)
SWIFTCSCF-3Physically Secure the Environment (Objective 3)
SWIFTCSCF-4Prevent Compromise of Credentials (Objective 4)
SWIFTCSCF-6Detect Anomalous Activity (Objective 6)
SWIFTCSCF-7Plan Incident Response (Objective 7)
How this is calculated
Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to that control. Likely
covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third
standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one
friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified
fact.
Coverage is not symmetric.
Run it the other way and you will get a
different number; both are correct.
From 332,959 cross-framework control
mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against
their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means
the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.
Try another pair ยท
Today's edition