Framework overlap

Does FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) cover Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018?

You hold FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and have been told to do Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018. Here is how much overlaps, control by control.

20% of Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018 you already have

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) already covers about 20% of Singapore Cybersecurity Act 2018, leaving 4 of 5 controls as genuinely new work.

Already covered 1 Likely covered 0 New work 4

What is genuinely new work

Nothing in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) reaches these. This is the list to scope.

SGCYBER-2
Codes of Practice, Standards, Audits
SGCYBER-3
Cyber Incident Reporting
SGCYBER-4
Licensing of Cybersecurity Services
SGCYBER-5
Investigation, Enforcement, Cooperation
Show the 1 you already have
SGCYBER-1
Critical Information Infrastructure (CII) Designation and Registration

How this is calculated

Already covered means a mapping runs from a control in FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to that control. Likely covered means no direct mapping exists but both frameworks map to the same control in a third standard. New work means neither. We keep those separate rather than adding them into one friendlier number, because blending them would present a two-hop inference as a verified fact.

Coverage is not symmetric. Run it the other way and you will get a different number; both are correct.

From 332,959 cross-framework control mappings across 723 frameworks, 531 of them verified against their source documents. It does not tell you that you are compliant: a mapped control means the two standards ask for the same thing, not that you have done it.

Try another pair ยท Today's edition